



Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Asignatura: Sociología comparada, Profesor: , Carrera: Estudios Internacionales, Universidad: UC3M
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 5
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!




Sociology is the scientific discipline that seeks to enlighten our lives by revealing the complex causal connection between highly recurrent social relationships and individual unhappiness and distress. Sociologists are in charge of two tasks: first, they have a political task, which consists of identifying and systematizing personal troubles to study their impact on social structures; and, second, an emotional task, which consists of studying how social situations impact on the population. Comparative sociology is the subdiscipline in sociology that contributes to understand this connection by establishing comparison between different nation- states.
The Content and Promise of Sociology
Humans have always searched for explanations about their social and political reality. For long, most of these explanations had a religious content (agency to trascendental entities), but also to non-religious intellectuals (philosophers, artists and historians). However, the search for systematic formulations is more recent; it starts between the beginning of the 18th century and begining of the 19th century because of four main factors:
The Promise
In contrast to other social sciences (for example, economics), sociology lacks a cohesive ‘paradigm´ (it is hard to identify what is distinct about a sociological argument). There is a good proxy provided by in the essay of Charles Wright Mills The Sociological Imagination (1959). The basic argument of Wright Mills in this essay is that the main task of the social sciences is to establish links between “personal problems” and broad social structures, which requires a heavy intelectual investment and lots of creativity. Wright Mills introduce the term “sociological imagination”, which is an ability of the mind that connects the social structure with personal troubles, which threaten our ideal life situation, in order to enlight our lives and let us be free. According to Wright Mills, sociological imagination is a source of personal empowerment.
efforts, inner struggles… Sometimes, personal experiences turn into problems if they are inconsistent with dominant values in society. For example, we expect to be economically independent, but that is not posible if we are unemployed.
topic for public opinion.
concrete objective. According to Brym and Lie, we can identify three levels of social structure:
Made through face-to-face interactions. An example of this level of social structure are weak and strong ties.
circle of intimates and acquitances. An example of macrostructure is patriarchy.
countries and individuals. Its importance is increasing. An example of global structure are ‘global culture’ and sacralization of rights.
The Demands and Outcomes of S.I.
Establishing the links between feelings and social structures constitutes an intellectual challenge. Sociological imagination requires overcoming important intellectual hurdles:
The promise of sociological imagination compensates the challenges it entails, and attaining more sociological imagination produces two main positive effects:
understanding of the meaning of our lives and let us account for major personal events, which determines real chances of becoming free and rational actors. Hence, we can say that sociological imagination is a source of intelectual empowerment.
society, sociologists can have a major impact in transforming the social issues that are a matter of attention by public opinion. Wright Mills characterizes this imagination as “sociological” because he considers that sociologists have mobilized it in the most fertile way. Also, to Wright Mills, the sociological imagination can also emerge in other fields (literature, journalism, private sector…). However, if pursued in a non-scientific manner, it leads to unclear statements.
wars with each other. Scholars have to use units of analysis and variables to extract recurrent patterns. In one hand, according to Przeworski and Teune, comparative social science research seeks to “generate general statements about social phenomena”. In the other hand, Bendix defines comparative sociology as an attempt to develop concepts and generalizations at a level between what is true to all societies and what is true of one society at one point in time and space.
Specificities of CS
Sociology is a highly diverse discipline in objects of analysis, methods and techniques, and it has several subdisciplines. Unlike in political science, CS is not an established subdiscipline in sociology, but it is distinctive. Between 1900s and 1970s there was a consensus that CS takes the whole society as the explanatory factor (for example, for Wright Mills the nation-state is the core unit of social). But in the 1970s debate resurged:
explantions to social phenomenon.
and Teune 1970). Comparisons are at the same time across systems and within systems (not only across systems). In this case, the researcher compares two or more countries or, within each country, two or more groups. It’s distinctive in using characteristics of the nation-state as the explanatory factor (Ragin 1982). “According to the arguments I have presented up to this point, comparative Sociology is distinct from noncomparative Sociology because it uses a particular explanatory unit, the Society or a system (…) The use of such explanations is based on two meta-theoretical assumptions: (1) that societies exist, and (2) that the societal level is appropiate and desirable explanatory level” (Ragin 1982: 107). It’s the dominant approach in CS. There are three arguments that explain why Comparative sociology commonly compares across nation-states:
country uniformization
uniformization
diversity Taking those dimensions into account, Comparative soicology conducts two types of comparisons:
compares across countries in a given DV.
compares across countries in the difference between those groups.
Summary