



Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
El report individual de una actividad en clase
Tipo: Ejercicios
1 / 5
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!




Individual report Sara Muñiz Nanin From our preparation and corresponding debate we can conclude the following. To start with, the open system theory changed the way of thinking about organizational management from mechanical view of organization. It looks at management as an open-ended process. It emphasized detachment, objectivity and control. Today organizations are perceived as an open ended process of coordinating purposeful individuals whose actions stem from applying their unique interpretations to the particular situations confronting them. In the contingency approach is a management theory that helps the manager to adopt the best management style, is dependent on the context of the situation. Contingency approach helps to understand that management activity such as planning, controlling, leadership or organisation are completely dependent on the circumstances. Regarding the structural functionalism approach the different parts of the organisation work together to maintain the organism (system) alive and in good health. This approach is applicable when affected by external conditions the systems undergo self-impulsed and repetitive transformations. In decision making the conclusions were as follows; it is a simple process used by managers in taking action for solving the problem. It is an integral part of the management system of a company which aims ate improving efficiency. Decision making is the one through which managers are able to take the right decision at the right time. Taking decision in the core part of every organisation. Goal centred approach are organisations as goal attainment devices. They are arbitrary focussed of interest, marketplaces whose structures and processes are the outcome of the complex accommodation made by actors exchanging a variety of incentives and pursuing a diversity of goals. The existence of goals os an unquestionable assumption. The only difficulty, insofar as any is recognised, lies in determining precisely what goals of any particular organisation are. Finally in natural systems approach the behaviour of individuals in organisations is influenced by the social context. They maintain the environment constant 8 closed system). It emphasises that the organisation should attend more things than just economic motivation of workers or physical conditions of work: they must also take into account social organisation and sentiment in order to make workers remain satisfied. This debate during class has given me the opportunity to defend a theory which I wasn´t a hundred percent convinced with, however I was able to succeed in the defence of my theory. Also the opportunity of listening to other defending their theory provided me the ability to improvise, in order to defend or agree with their arguments. Debating in class gives you the
opportunity to open yourself to new experiences and develop language and public speaking techniques. Open systems theory refers simply to the concept that organizations are strongly influenced by their environment. The environment consists of other organizations that exert various forces of an economic, political, or social nature. The environment also provides key resources that sustain the organization and lead to change and survival. Open systems theory was developed after World War II in reaction to earlier theories of organizations, such as the human relations perspective of Elton Mayo and the administrative theories of Henri Fayol, which treated the organization largely as a self-contained entity. Virtually all modern theories of organisation utilize the open systems perspective. As a result, open systems theories come in many flavours. For example, contingency theorists argue that organizations are organized in ways that best fit the environment in which they are embedded. Institutional theorists see organizations as a means by which the societal values and beliefs are embedded in organizational structure and expressed in organizational change. Resource dependency theorists see the organization as adapting to the environment as dictated by its resource providers. Although there is a great variety in the perspectives provided by open systems theories, they share the perspective that an organization’s survival is dependent upon its relationship with the environment. The main assumptions of the theory are as follows. According to Kramer and De Smith (1977), a steady state refers to an open system maintaining an unchanging state even when input and output are still in operation. This makes the system appear static to the observer despite the fact that the flow of resources through the system is dynamic and continuous. A popular example of this is the maintenance of the human body temperature at 37° Celsius. In this case, the amount of heat generated by the body’s metabolism is kept equal to the heat lost to the environment. As a result, a constant body temperature can be maintained. The most important quality of an open system is that it can perform work, which is unachievable in a closed system in an equilibrium state because a closed system in equilibrium does not need energy for the preservation of its state, nor can energy be obtained from it. In order for it to perform work, it is necessary that an open system is not in an equilibrium state. Emphasise the concept of system boundary. The boundary is an essential element on the definition of the system, distinguishing the organisation and its members from the external environment. Environment typically seen as everything outside the boundaries of an organisation, even though the boundaries are often nebulous or poorly drawn. It is the environment that provides raw materials to an organisation and receives the organisations outputs.
responsive to their requirements. This can lead to permeable boundaries with parents and others influencing school policies and priorities. In conclusion, although systems research has increased our knowledge of the relationships among environment, structure and performance, it has also increased our appreciation of the difficulties inherent in seeking to understand organisational dynamics holistically. But if open systems theory has failed to produce a general systems model capable of predicting and controlling organisational behaviour, it nonetheless provides public managers with an implicit theory of organisational effectiveness. The successful agency is one that finds an optimal fit between its organisational structure, its environment and what it seeks to achieve.
References: Galbraith, J.R. & Lawler, E.E. III (Eds.) (1993). Organizing for the future: The new logic for managing complex organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J.E, (2001). Schoolteaching in context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M.W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass