Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


Método GOFFD para Imagem de Estruturas Complexas com Contraste de Velocidade e Dips, Manuais, Projetos, Pesquisas de Física

Neste documento, apresentamos um método de migração finance-diferença fourier otimizado (goffd) que utiliza uma aproximação racional do operador raiz quadrado na equação de onda unidirecional. O método é globalmente otimizado e oferece melhor precisão para imagens de estruturas geofísicas com fortes contrastes de velocidade lateral e dips empinados. O documento discute a otimização do esquema goffd, análise de erros e comparação de respostas de impulso de diferentes métodos de migração finance-diferença fourier.

Tipologia: Manuais, Projetos, Pesquisas

Antes de 2010

Compartilhado em 05/05/2010

iuri-boaventura-9
iuri-boaventura-9 🇧🇷

4 documentos

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
Globally optimized Fourier finite-difference migration method
Lian-Jie Huang
and Michael C. Fehler, Los Alamos Seismic Research Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Summary
To accurately image complex structures with strong lateral ve-
locity variations and steep dips, we develop a globally opti-
mized Fourier finite-difference method that uses a rational ap-
proximation of the square-root operator in the one-way wave
equation. The method uses a split-step Fourier operator cou-
pled with a one-term optimized finite-difference operator. The
two coefficients in the rational approximation are obtained by
an optimization scheme that maximizes the maximum dip an-
gle of the method for a given model. Our opt imized method
uses the same coefficients throughout a model in contrast
to Ristow-R¨uhl’s locally optimized Fourier finite-difference
scheme which uses an optimized coefficient that varies with the
lateral velocity contrast and hence is cumbersome during im-
plementation. For small lateral velocity contrasts, our method
is accurate for dip angles of up to
90
Æ
like other Fourier finite-
difference methods. For large lateral velocity contrasts, max-
imum dip angles for our method are approximately
65
Æ
67
Æ
,
which are approximately
16
Æ
20
Æ
larger than those for Ristow-
uhl’s unoptimized Fourier finite-difference method, while
Ristow-R¨uhl’s locally optimized scheme can handle approxi-
mately
16
Æ
larger dip angles than their unoptimized scheme.
The computational cost of our method is the same as the other
Fourier finite-difference methods.
Introduction
Migration methods that use fi nite-difference of the one-way
wave equation can handle arbitrarily large velocity contrasts but
are only accurate up to a fixed dip angle even in a homogeneous
region (Claerbout, 1985). The phase-shift migration (Gazdag,
1978) is accurate for dip angles of up to
90
Æ
but it requires
a laterally homogeneous velocity model. A hybrid approach,
termed the Fourier finite-difference (FFD) method proposed
by Ristow and uhl (1994), has the advantage of both finite-
difference and phase-shift methods. The FFD method uses a
Taylor expansion of the square-root operator in the one-way
wave equation and the expansion is recombined into a rational
approximation. Its implementation uses the split-step Fourier
(SSF) propagator (Stoffa et al., 1990; Huang and Fehler, 1998)
followed by a finite-difference scheme to increase the accu-
racy for imaging structures with large lateral velocity contrasts.
Some other Fourier transform based methods, such as the ex-
tended local Born Fourier (Huang et al., 1999b), the extended
local Rytov Fourier (Huang et al., 1999a), and the quasi-Born
Fourier (Huang and Fehler, 2000) methods, are more accurate
than the SSF method, but they are less accurate than the FFD
method for large lateral velocity contrasts. Another version of
FFD (Xie and Wu, 1998) is based on the approximation of the
square-root operator using the first order Pad ´e approximation
which is the same as Claerbout ’s
45
Æ
or Muir’s
R
2
approxima-
tions (Claerbout, 1985). It is less accurate than Ristow-R¨uhl’s
FFD method. We refer to the Pad´e-based method as the PFFD
method hereafter.
To increase the accuracy of the FFD methods, one can in princi-
pal add additional terms to the finite-difference operator. How-
ever, the computational cost of the finite-difference operator
increases proportionally to the number of terms added. To
increase the accuracy of the second-order FFD method while
using only one term in the finite-difference operator, Ristow
and uhl (1994) proposed a locally optimized Four ier finite-
difference (LOFFD) scheme in which they use an optimized
expansion coefficient for each lateral velocity contrast. For a
heterogeneous model, the LOFF D method requires a large ta-
ble of the optimized coefficient. L ooking for a value of the
optimized coefficient for each grid point from a large table of
the coefficient makes the LOFFD method cumbersome during
implementation, especially in 3D cases.
We propose an FFD method based on a rational approxi mation
of the square-root operator. The form of our FFD scheme is
the same as that of the PFFD method. However, the two coef-
ficients in the rational approximation used in our FFD method
are determined using an optimization scheme that maximizes
the maximum dip angle for a given model, rather than us-
ing those of the one-term Pad ´e approximation. We give the
optimization algorithm, perform the error analysis of our op-
timized scheme, and compare impulse responses of different
methods. Our optimized FFD method does not require a table
of optimized coefficients because these coefficients are fixed
for a given model. Therefore, we call it the globally opti-
mized Fourier finite-difference (GOFFD) method. The GOFFD
method is accurate for dips with angles of approximately
16
Æ
20
Æ
larger than the FFD method, while the LOFFD scheme can
handle approximately
16
Æ
larger dip angles than their unopti-
mized scheme. The computational cost of the GOFFD method
is the same as the other FFD methods.
Expansion of Square-Root Operator
The one-way wave equation in the frequency-space domain is
@P
(
x; z
;
!
)
@z
=
iQ
(
x; z
;
!
)
P
(
x; z
;
!
)
;
(1)
where
P
is the pressure and the operator
Q
is defined by
Q
s
!
2
v
2
(
x; z
)
+
@
2
@x
2
=
!
v
(
x; z
)
R;
(2)
where
!
is the circular frequency,
v
is the velocity, and
R
is the
square-root operator given by
R
p
1
X
2
;
(3)
with
X
2
=
v
2
!
2
@
2
@x
2
:
(4)
SEG 2000 Expanded AbstractsSEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts
Downloaded 04 Sep 2009 to 200.128.60.89. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
pf3
pf4

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe Método GOFFD para Imagem de Estruturas Complexas com Contraste de Velocidade e Dips e outras Manuais, Projetos, Pesquisas em PDF para Física, somente na Docsity!

Globally optimized Fourier finite-difference migration method

Lian-Jie Huang  and Michael C. Fehler, Los Alamos Seismic Research Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Summary

To accurately image complex structures with strong lateral ve-

locity variations and steep dips, we develop a globally opti-

mized Fourier finite-difference method that uses a rational ap-

proximation of the square-root operator in the one-way wave

equation. The method uses a split-step Fourier operator cou-

pled with a one-term optimized finite-difference operator. The

two coefficients in the rational approximation are obtained by

an optimization scheme that maximizes the maximum dip an-

gle of the method for a given model. Our optimized method

uses the same coefficients throughout a model in contrast

to Ristow-R¨uhl’s locally optimized Fourier finite-difference

scheme which uses an optimized coefficient that varies with the

lateral velocity contrast and hence is cumbersome during im-

plementation. For small lateral velocity contrasts, our method

is accurate for dip angles of up to 90 Æ like other Fourier finite-

difference methods. For large lateral velocity contrasts, max-

imum dip angles for our method are approximately 65 Æ – 67 Æ ,

which are approximately 16 Æ – 20 Æ larger than those for Ristow-

R¨uhl’s unoptimized Fourier finite-difference method, while

Ristow-R¨uhl’s locally optimized scheme can handle approxi-

mately 16 Æ larger dip angles than their unoptimized scheme.

The computational cost of our method is the same as the other

Fourier finite-difference methods.

Introduction

Migration methods that use finite-difference of the one-way

wave equation can handle arbitrarily large velocity contrasts but

are only accurate up to a fixed dip angle even in a homogeneous

region (Claerbout, 1985). The phase-shift migration (Gazdag,

1978) is accurate for dip angles of up to 90 Æ but it requires

a laterally homogeneous velocity model. A hybrid approach,

termed the Fourier finite-difference (FFD) method proposed

by Ristow and R¨uhl (1994), has the advantage of both finite-

difference and phase-shift methods. The FFD method uses a

Taylor expansion of the square-root operator in the one-way

wave equation and the expansion is recombined into a rational

approximation. Its implementation uses the split-step Fourier

(SSF) propagator (Stoffa et al., 1990; Huang and Fehler, 1998)

followed by a finite-difference scheme to increase the accu-

racy for imaging structures with large lateral velocity contrasts.

Some other Fourier transform based methods, such as the ex-

tended local Born Fourier (Huang et al., 1999b), the extended

local Rytov Fourier (Huang et al., 1999a), and the quasi-Born

Fourier (Huang and Fehler, 2000) methods, are more accurate

than the SSF method, but they are less accurate than the FFD

method for large lateral velocity contrasts. Another version of

FFD (Xie and Wu, 1998) is based on the approximation of the

square-root operator using the first order Pad´e approximation

which is the same as Claerbout’s 45 Æ or Muir’s R 2 approxima-

tions (Claerbout, 1985). It is less accurate than Ristow-R¨uhl’s

FFD method. We refer to the Pad´e-based method as the PFFD

method hereafter.

To increase the accuracy of the FFD methods, one can in princi-

pal add additional terms to the finite-difference operator. How-

ever, the computational cost of the finite-difference operator

increases proportionally to the number of terms added. To

increase the accuracy of the second-order FFD method while

using only one term in the finite-difference operator, Ristow

and R¨uhl (1994) proposed a locally optimized Fourier finite-

difference (LOFFD) scheme in which they use an optimized

expansion coefficient for each lateral velocity contrast. For a

heterogeneous model, the LOFFD method requires a large ta-

ble of the optimized coefficient. Looking for a value of the

optimized coefficient for each grid point from a large table of

the coefficient makes the LOFFD method cumbersome during

implementation, especially in 3D cases.

We propose an FFD method based on a rational approximation

of the square-root operator. The form of our FFD scheme is

the same as that of the PFFD method. However, the two coef-

ficients in the rational approximation used in our FFD method

are determined using an optimization scheme that maximizes

the maximum dip angle for a given model, rather than us-

ing those of the one-term Pad´e approximation. We give the

optimization algorithm, perform the error analysis of our op-

timized scheme, and compare impulse responses of different

methods. Our optimized FFD method does not require a table

of optimized coefficients because these coefficients are fixed

for a given model. Therefore, we call it the globally opti-

mized Fourier finite-difference (GOFFD) method. The GOFFD

method is accurate for dips with angles of approximately 16 Æ –

20 Æ larger than the FFD method, while the LOFFD scheme can

handle approximately 16 Æ larger dip angles than their unopti-

mized scheme. The computational cost of the GOFFD method

is the same as the other FFD methods.

Expansion of Square-Root Operator

The one-way wave equation in the frequency-space domain is

@ P (x; z ;! ) @ z

= i Q(x; z ;! ) P (x; z ;! ); (1)

where P is the pressure and the operator Q is defined by

Q 

s

v 2 (x; z )

@ x^2

v (x; z )

R ; (2)

where! is the circular frequency, v is the velocity, and R is the

square-root operator given by

R 

p

1 X 2 ; (3)

with

X

2 =

v 2 ! 2

@ x^2

SEG 2000 Expanded AbstractsSEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts

forall  1 , 0 Æ <  1  90 Æ

forall  2 ,  1 <  2  90 Æ

 calculate a and b (eqs.17 and 18)

forall m, 1  m  mmax

forall ( ), 0 <   1 ; 0 Æ <   90 Æ

 calculate " (eq.13)

 find maximum  when "  1

(denoted as m (m))

end forall ( )

 find minimum value of m (m)

(denoted as  1 ; 2 ( 1 ;  2 ))

end forall m

 find optimized a and b that give

the maximum value of  1 ; 2 ( 1 ;  2 ),

denoted as  (see Table 1)

end forall  2

end forall  1

Algorithm 1: Procedure to find optimized a and b.

We expand the square-root operator R in the form

R  1

a X 2 1 b X 2

where two free coefficients a and b are determined using an

optimization approach described in the next section. The dif-

ference between the operator Q given by equation (2) and that

in a background media with a velocity of v 0 (z ) is

D =

v

p

1 X 2

v 0

q

1 X 20 (6)

where X 20 is given by

X 20 =

v 02 ! 2

@ x^2

X 2

m^2

where the lateral velocity contrast m(x; z ) = v (x; z )=v 0 (z )

is the reciprocal of the refraction index. Making use of equa-

tion (5), combining the two fractions into one, and keeping only

the first-order term in the numerator and denominator of the re-

sulting fraction, equation (6) becomes

D 

v

v 0

v 0

a (m 1) X 02 1 b (1 + m^2 ) X 02

Therefore, equation (2) can be approximated by

Q 

s

v (^20)

@ x^2

v 0

m

v 0

a (m 1) X 02 1 b ( 1 + m^2 ) X (^20)

The combination of the first two terms of this equation is

the split-step Fourier operator and the third term is a finite-

difference operator implemented using an implicit scheme.

Optimization

The two coefficients a and b in equation (9) are obtained by

minimizing the error of the approximate operator Q given by

Table 1: Values of a and b for different range of m = v =v 0 , 1  m  mmax.  in the table is the minimum value of the maximum dip angles for a given range of m.

mmax  1  2 a b 

1.5 20.73Æ^ 78.61Æ^ 0.48879 0.43151 68.5Æ

2.0 22.47Æ^ 78.44Æ^ 0.48686 0.43297 67.0Æ

2.5 26.18Æ 77.95Æ 0.48230 0.43601 66.4Æ

3.0 29.16Æ 77.44Æ 0.47826 0.43848 65.6Æ

3.5 31.46Æ^ 76.96Æ^ 0.47494 0.44032 64.9Æ

a)

(^0) 1.0 1.5 2.

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Maximmum Dip Angle (degree)

1.0 1.5 2. m=v/v (^0)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Maximmum Dip Angle (degree)

PFFD

FFD

GOFFD (mmax =2) LOFFD

SSF

b)

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Maximmum Dip Angle (degree)

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Maximmum Dip Angle (degree)

PFFD

FFD

GOFFD (mmax =3) LOFFD

SSF

m=v/v 0

Fig. 1: Comparison of maximum dip angles versus the lateral velocity contrast m for the SSF, PFFD, FFD, LOFFD, and GOFFD method. (a) is for mmax = 2 and (b) is for mmax = 3.

that equation. We consider a given velocity v in the following.

From equations (2)–(4), (7), and (9), and making use of the

transformation: @ 2 =@ x^2 ( )k x^2 , we obtain the approximate

Q in the frequency-wavenumber domain given by

Q

app

v

R

app

with

R

app = m

r

^2

m^2

  • (1 m)

a

m

^2

1 b

m^2

^2

where the superscript “app” in equations (10) and (11) repre-

sents the approximation, and ^2 is defined by

2 

v 2 ! 2

k

2 x =^ sin

2

where  is the dip angle. The percentage relative error of Qapp

is

jQapp^ Qj Q

jR app^ R j R

SEG 2000 Expanded AbstractsSEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts

tions of the SEG/EAGE salt model using the GOFFD method.

Conclusions

We have used a rational approximation of the square-root op-

erator in the one-way wave equation to develop a globally op-

timized Fourier finite-difference method for imaging complex

structures with strong lateral velocity variations and steep dips.

The two optimized coefficients in the rational approximation

are fixed for a given model. The formal error analysis and im-

pulse responses of different Fourier finite-difference methods

demonstrate that our optimized method is superior to the other

Fourier finite-difference methods. For small lateral velocity

contrasts, our method is accurate for dip angles of up to 90 Æ

like other Fourier finite-difference methods. For large lateral

velocity contrasts, the maximum dip angles for our method are

approximately 65 Æ – 67 Æ , which are approximately 28 Æ larger

than those for the Pad´e-based Fourier finite-difference method,

and 16 Æ – 20 Æ larger than those for Ristow-R¨uhl’s unoptimized

scheme, while Ristow-R¨uhl’s locally optimized scheme can

handle approximately 16 Æ larger dip angles than their unop-

timized scheme. The computational cost of our method is the

same as the other Fourier finite-difference methods.

Acknowledgments

We thank James Albright and Peter Roberts for their careful reviews of this paper. This work was funded by the US Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences through contract W-7405-ENG-36 to Los Alamos National Laboratory.

References

Claerbout, J. F., 1985, Imaging the earth’s interior: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Gazdag, J., 1978, Wave equation migration with the phase-shift method: Geophysics, 43 , 1342–1351. Huang, L.-J., and Fehler, M. C., 1998, Accuracy analysis of the split- step Fourier propagator: implications for seismic modeling and mi- gration: Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 88 , 18–29. Huang, L.-J., and Fehler, M. C., 2000, Quasi-Born Fourier migration: Geophys. J. Intern., 140 , 521–534. Huang, L.-J., Fehler, M. C., Roberts, P. M., and Burch, C. C., 1999a, Extended local Rytov Fourier migration method: Geophysics, 64 , 1535–1545. Huang, L.-J., Fehler, M. C., and Wu, R.-S., 1999b, Extended local Born Fourier migration method: Geophysics, 64 , 1524–1534. Ristow, D., and R¨uhl, T., 1994, Fourier finite-difference migration: Geophysics, 59 , 1882–1893. Stoffa, P. L., Fokkema, J. T., de Luna Freire, R. M., and Kessinger, W. P., 1990, Split-step Fourier migration: Geophysics, 55 , 410–421. Xie, X.-B., and Wu, R.-S., 1998, Improve the wide angle accuracy of screen method under large contrast: 68th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1811–1814.

a)

0

1

2

Depth (km)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Horizontal Distance (km)

10 o

b)

0

1

2

Depth (km)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Horizontal Distance (km)

39 o

c)

0

1

2

Depth (km)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Horizontal Distance (km)

47 o

d)

0

1

2

Depth (km)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Horizontal Distance (km)

67 o

Fig. 3: Impulse responses of different migration methods in a medium with v = 4500 m/s. A reference medium with v 0 = 1500 m/s was used to obtain these impulse responses. In each panel, the red-solid-line semicircle is the ideal position of the impulse response and the angle is the maximum dip angle predicted by the formal error analysis. (a) SSF method; (b) PFFD method; (c) FFD method; (d) GOFFD method.

SEG 2000 Expanded AbstractsSEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts