



Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Encontra documentos específicos para os exames da tua universidade
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Methods for improving the efficiency of solar cells made from a blend of p3ht and pcbm, including heat-treatment, long-time solvent curing, and filtering preformed nanofibers of p3ht. Morphology studies using various techniques provide insights into the formation of crystalline and amorphous domains in these devices.
Tipologia: Notas de estudo
1 / 6
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!




DOI: 10.1002/adma.
In the past several years, polymer–fullerene mixtures have been intensely studied for use in organic solar cells because they can be deposited from solution, are compatible with low- cost roll-to-roll fabrication technology, and have shown high power conversion efficiency (g), up to 4–5%. [1–3]^ The best de- vices consist of a single bulk-heterojunction active layer, in which the polymer (donor) and fullerene (acceptor) are de- posited from a common solvent. As the solvent dries the do- nor and acceptor components separate into domains. The final efficiency of the solar cell has been shown to be extremely sensitive to the size, composition, and crystallinity of the formed domains. [4,5]^ Improvement of the morphology in de- vices fabricated with a mixture of [6,6]-phenyl C 61 -butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) and regioregular poly(3-hexylthio- phene) (P3HT) has been achieved by using heat-treatment techniques[2,6]^ and long-time solvent curing,[1]^ with resulting record efficiencies. More recently, a method for increasing the crystallinity of the P3HT component has been introduced which involves filtering preformed nanofibers of P3HT out of solution and mixing the prepared nanofiber dispersion with PCBM to increase the efficiency of as-cast devices.[7]^ Interest- ingly, the best device performance was achieved by mixing lower-molecular-weight ( M W) amorphous P3HT back into the solution to reduce the crystalline content of the active layer and, thereby, to increase connection between crystalline do- mains. Studies of the M W impact on P3HT/PCBM solar cells have indicated that a large polydispersity and number-average molecular weight ( M n) over 19000 g mol -1^ leads to improved efficiency.[8,9]^ Morphology studies of organic field-effect transistor (OFET) devices indicate that the increased M W leads to better network formation between crystalline domains.[10,11]
The morphology of these improved devices has been stud- ied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM),[12]^ graz- ing-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD),[13,14]^ atomic force micros- copy (AFM),[10]^ scanning electron microscopy (SEM),[15] NMR, [16]^ and a variety of other optical [14]^ and electrical tech- niques. [17]^ The morphology studies give a picture of a device in which the P3HT forms aligned/crystalline domains, be- tween which are amorphous segments of P3HT and PCBM. [14] These domains form with larger size and crystallinity for high- er heat-treatment temperatures[18]^ and longer solvent soaking times.[19,20]^ Depending on the fabrication and measurement techniques, the aligned domains of P3HT are depicted as fi- bers[12]^ or as shapeless masses. [14] The majority of these studies do not, however, allow quanti- fication of the percentage of the P3HT that is agglomerated/ crystalline in the final device. Only by making use of the nanofiber filtration technique[7]^ have the authors been given the ability to control the crystalline content of the P3HT in so- lution and in the final device. The disadvantages of this tech- nique are the necessity of more complicated preparation, and filtered P3HT is restricted to a fibrous form that requires the addition of amorphous P3HT to provide connections between crystalline domains. We present here a simple method to de- termine the agglomerated–amorphous ratio of the P3HT and to control the degree of agglomeration/crystallinity of the P3HT in the final device by using a solvent mixing method and no further heat-treatment or prepreparation of the polymer. The most obvious change that heat-treatment and solvent soaking yield on a P3HT:PCBM layers is the change in col- or.[6,21,22]^ It has been widely reported that the P3HT absorp- tion red-shifts and a series of vibronic peaks become visible at k ∼ 600 nm, 550 nm, and 510 nm.[6,11]^ This red-shift has been assigned to increased planarization and stabilization of the P3HT chains that accompanies self-stacking of the poly- mer.[10,14]^ The crystal structure for these self-stacking domains has been solved by using XRD and TEM, and shows a her- ringbone interconnection of the alkyl chains and an a -dimen- sion stacking distance of 1.6 nm.[14]^ The p–p chain stacking of the P3HT chains in crystallites has been measured to be 0.38 nm.[13]^ The herringbone structure and planarization of the P3HT with heating has been confirmed using heteronuc- lear solid-state NMR measurements. [16]^ The red-shift in the UV-vis spectrum occurs proportionally to the degree of ag- glomeration of the P3HT. [7,23] The pure amorphous electronic spectrum of P3HT or a mix- ture of P3HT and PCBM is simple to measure. A solution UV-vis spectrum can also be measured in the liquid state. If
240 © 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2008 , 20 , 240–
[] Prof. K. Meerholz, Dr. A. J. Moulé[+] Institute of Physical Chemistry University of Cologne Luxemburgerstr. 116, 50939 Köln (Germany) E-mail: [email protected] [+] Present address: University of California, Davis, Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, 1 Shields Av., Davis, CA 95616, USA. [*] We would like to acknowledge the Alexander von Humboldt founda- tion for the post-doctoral grant of A.M. We would also like the thank German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) for funding EKOS project (O3N2023D) and the ministry of Science and Innova- tion of Northrhine-Westfalia (Elena-project). We thank Tanja Tege- der for taking the SEM image. Supporting Information is available online from Wiley InterScience or from the authors.
the solvated polymer is titrated with an “unfriendly” solvent, a solvatochromic red-shift of the absorption spectrum occurs which is similar to the red-shift seen upon condensation into a film. [24]^ Physically, the polymer forms nanoparticle aggregates in a stable mini-emulsion. This mini-emulsion effect has been used to make polymer solar cells and light-emitting diodes with highly controlled morphology. [25–27]^ In the context of this study, the solvatochromic effect can be used to gain a quanti- tative comparison of the absorption features of liquid-phase and solid-phase P3HT. A series of UV-vis spectra with different ratios of chloro- benzene (ClB) and t -butanol was recorded (see Supporting Information, Fig. S1a). It can be clearly seen that the amor- phous P3HT spectrum red-shifts, and with high t -butanol con- centration is completely composed of nanoparticles or aggre- gated P3HT. Measurement of the dispersion with high t - butanol concentration with dynamic light scattering indicates a narrow particle size distribution with diameter of about 55 nm (assuming a spherical particle). For comparison, a pure heat-treated P3HT thin-film spectrum cast from ClB is dis- played. The aggregated and thin-film spectra are essentially identical (see Fig. S1b for direct comparison). Using this tech- nique it is possible to get both the pure amorphous and pure aggregated spectrum, at identical mass-to-volume concentra- tions, and therefore to quantitatively compare the spectra. As has been previously shown, P3HT absorbs ∼12% more strongly at the absorption maximum when aggregated.[24] As compared to the recent results given by Berson et al.,[7] the solvent mixture used here produces 100% P3HT aggre- gated content, while they found 75% nanofiber content in p- xylene solutions. A method to produce P3HT nanofibers has been demonstrated by Ihn et al. and later Merlo et al. who de- scribed the spontaneous formation of nanofibers of P3HT in a p-xylene solution.[28,29]^ The solution was, however, a mixture of P3HT nanofibers and amorphous P3HT that had to be fil- tered to obtain pure nanofibers. Our approach does not re- quire filtering to obtain pure agglomerated P3HT, which is an important advantage for production of the organic photovol- taic (OPV) cells using solvent mixtures. By taking SEM im- ages of the nanoparticles spin-cast from a dilute chloroform/ methanol mixture onto indium tin oxide (ITO), it was possible to see that a network structure was formed with a minimum length scale of 20–30 nm (Fig. 1). The principle of using an unfriendly/dipolar solvent is also interesting in order to control the aggregation of P3HT in mixed polymer–fullerene device layers. As has been shown by Zhang et al., a dopant solvent can have a large effect on the fi- nal morphology of a polymer–fullerene blend at very low con- centrations if the dopant has a higher boiling point than the main solvent.[30]^ We have found that adding 0.33–6.5% by vol- ume of nitrobenzene (NtB) to a typical casting solvent, such as ClB, for P3HT:PCBM blend solar cells allows for a full con- trol of the final device morphology. Specifically, the aggre- gated content of the P3HT can be adjusted from the as-cast ClB mixture value of 59% aggregated to 100% aggregated P3HT content. The solution itself does not change color, nor
is the aggregated content of the P3HT increased until the ra- tio of ClB:NtB in the spinning film is reduced to nearly pure NtB as a solvent. Depicted in Figure 2 are UV-vis spectra of as-cast thin-films with NtB doped into the casting solvent from 0% to 6.25% by volume. The peak at ∼600 nm that is typically associated with agglomeration in P3HT grows with
increased NtB content until, at 6.25% NtB concentration, the UV-vis spectrum can be fit using only the pure P3HT aggre- gated and PCBM spectra (Fig. S3). NtB itself has a strong visible absorption at ∼400 nm. It is clear from the spectra that the NtB content in the as-cast film is below the detection lim- it. For comparison, we fabricated devices with preformed na- nofibers in a method similar to (and concurrent to) Berson et al. [7]^ Here, P3HT is dissolved into o-xylene (OX) at high tem- perature and later stirred at room temperature for several days. The original red solution slowly changes color to black as the aggregated P3HT content increases. If the black solu- tion is mixed with PCBM and used to make solar-cell layers,
COMMUNICATION
Adv. Mater. 2008 , 20 , 240–245 © 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.advmat.de 241
100 nm
Figure 1 : SEM image of P3HT spin cast from a dilute (0.1 mg mL–1^ ) solu- tion of 1:1 chloroform/methanol onto an ITO substrate. The ITO is the grainy substance in the background. The P3HT forms into 3D networks because of rapid aggregation during drying.
400 500 600 700 800
Abs [Normalized]
wavelength [nm]
Increasing Aggrigated Content
Figure 2. a) UV-vis spectra of 3:2 P3HT:PCBM as-cast PV devices with 0% (solid line), 0.33% (dashed line), 0.67% (dotted line), 1.6% (dashed– dotted line), 3.2% (short dashed line), and 6.3% (solid line) nitroben- zene added into the chlorobenzene solvent. Offset from the other spectra is the as-cast PV device from the o-xylene dispersion (triangles).
phase behavior but does not give a morphological picture of what the effect of the NtB additive yields. In previous reports detailing the effects of heat-treatment and long-time solvent soaking on the improvement of P3HT/PCBM solar cells, an increase in surface roughness and an increase in the phase separation was documented using AFM. [1,2]^ In Figure 4, we show that the surface roughness increases and that the aver- age domain size also increases with increased aggregated pro-
portion of P3HT. Figure 4 compares as-cast ClB-amorph, ClB/NtB, and OX-np samples. The topography images show striking differences. The root mean square (rms) roughness of the ClB/NtB sample is an order of magnitude larger than for the ClB-amorph sample. Considering that the average sample thickness (as measured by UV-vis, profilometry, and AFM of scratched surface) in each case was ∼80 nm, the ClB/NtB sam- ple must be less than 35 nm thick in some locations and more
than 125 nm thick in others. With this large, pre-electrode- evaporation roughness we would expect that the ClB/NtB sample would suffer electrical contact problems at the metal cathode. The I–V curves in Figure 3 indicate, however, that the active layer has excellent electrical contact, as indicated by the high FF. We also show an AFM image of an as-cast OX-np sample. The surface roughness has an intermediate roughness between the ClB-amorph and ClB/NtB samples. No nanofiber structures can be seen in any of these images, though we know that nanofibers are incorporated into the OX-np cast layer by comparison as-cast films of pure P3HT (Fig. S2). The apparent average domain size, as measured by an AFM phase image, increases greatly in both the ClB/NtB and OX- np samples. The interpretation of the phase information has, however, been greatly complicated by the new picture of P3HT in an aggregated and amorphous configuration. The phase image generally gives a picture of the change in surface “hardness”, in which a two-component mixture, such as a polymer–fullerene mixture, can be interpreted as showing ful- lerene-rich and fullerene-poor domains.[34]^ With the presence of P3HT in amorphous and aggregated configurations, this is effectively a multicomponent system (amorphous P3HT rich and poor in PCBM, and aggregated P3HT rich and poor in PCBM). We show, using UV-vis measurements (Fig. S3a and b), that the as-cast ClB sample has a 35.4%:24.6% ratio of aggre- gated–amorphous P3HT content. Grazing-angle XRD mea- surements have shown no crystalline content in as-cast films of 1:2 P3HT:PCBM using ClB and chloroform as casting sol- vents.[13,14]^ The same study shows that as-cast pure P3HT films do have crystalline content.[13]^ However, high-resolution TEM measurements have shown the presence of nanocrystal- line domains even in untreated 1:2 P3HT:PCBM samples using o-dichlorobenzene as a casting solvent.[12]^ The ClB-amorph phase image (Fig. 4b) shows a very fine domain separation (< 50 nm) that is consistent with the formation of nanocrystalline domains. Even though the layers were cast from CLB and not heat treated, we believe that some crystalline P3HT forms due to the high P3HT content in the layer. From the UV-vis measurements, we expect the ClB/NtB sample to have ∼99% aggregated P3HT content. The appar- ent domain size is also much larger to an average of over 100 nm in size. Because essentially all of the P3HT is aggre- gated, we believe that the phase image can be interpreted as P3HT-rich domains (red–yellow) and PCBM-rich (cyan–blue) veins. This assignment is based on the idea that during spin- coating, aggregated P3HT-rich networks form with rounded domains and PCBM-rich veins are left between. Owing to the 3:2 P3HT:PCBM mixing ratio, there is a larger P3HT content in the layer. The large P3HT-rich domains are seen as red–yel- low in Figure 4d with comparatively smaller PCBM-rich veins. The exciton diffusion length in a similar conjugated polymer, OC 1 C 10 -PPV, has been measured to be ∼5 nm.[35] Considering the high efficiency of the ClB/NtB device, there
COMMUNICATION
Adv. Mater. 2008 , 20 , 240–245 © 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.advmat.de 243
Figure 4. Tapping mode AFM topography and phase images of as-cast OPV devices cast from a,b) chlorobenzene, c,d) chlorobenzene with 4.25% nitrobenzene added, and e,f) o-xylene with preformed P3HT nano- fiber content). The color code used in (b), (d), and (f) is identical.
must still be enough PCBM in the predominately P3HT net- works to ensure charge separation and transport out of the domains. In the as-cast OX-np sample, we calculated a ∼80% aggre- gated P3HT content. Some of the aggregated P3HT domains were formed in solution and, therefore, cannot contain PCBM. The phase image shows the greatest phase separation of the three samples with domains of over 300 nm. The as-cast and heat-treated devices shown in Figure 3 have reduced J sc values with respect to the ClB/NtB and heat-treated OX- amorph and ClB-amorph samples. We take this as proof that the degree of separation in the OX-np samples is too high and that some of the excitons formed do not separate into charges because they are too far from a donor/acceptor interface. After heat-treatment, the ClB/NtB and OX-np samples show very little change in the topography and phase AFM images (data not shown). The ClB-amorph sample shows increased surface roughness and increased domain size, as has been pre- viously published.[2] In conclusion, we have shown that the P3HT component of the P3HT/PCBM solar cells mixture is found in both aggre- gated and amorphous configurations. The ratio of the P3HT in the amorphous and aggregated phases can be controlled both in solution and in spin-cast films by adding a dipolar sol- vent that causes the P3HT to aggregate into nanoparticles or nanodomains, respectively. Reference to previous studies indi- cates that these nanoparticles/nanodomains are at least par- tially crystalline. Evidence for this change between an amor- phous and aggregated phase is given by the shape change of the UV-vis spectrum and AFM and SEM images of the formed nanostructures. We were able to use P3HT dissolved in a “friendly” solvent to measure the amorphous absorption. When a dipolar, but miscible second solvent is added to the solution, the P3HT forms nanoparticles that yield a fully ag- gregated or solid-state spectrum. In this way the amorphous and aggregated spectra could be compared quantitatively in the liquid phase. Using the principle of a dipolar additive to control aggrega- tion, we show that we can fabricate P3HT/PCBM solar cells with between < 59% and 100% aggregated P3HT by adding nitrobenzene to the solvent mixture. Layers spin-cast with over 4% NtB content have ∼100% aggregated P3HT content. The addition of the NtB causes the formation of aggregated P3HT networks during the drying process so that devices with nearly 4% power efficiency under AM1.5 illumination can be fabricated with no pre- or post-treatment steps, such as filtra- tion, heat-treatment, or solvent soaking. After heat-treat- ment, devices cast from ClB-amorph, OX-amorph and ClB/ NtB solutions have nearly identical I–V characteristics. The J sc does not change for the ClB/NtB sample with heat-treat- ment but the V oc increases, which leads to a power efficiency of ∼4.3%. Comparisons were also made with devices that incorporate preformed P3HT fibers that are cast from OX. The increase in the aggregated content improves the device quality for as- cast devices but is limited after heat-treatment because of ex-
clusion of PCBM from the aggregated P3HT domains. These observations are supported by AFM tapping-mode phase im- ages that show larger domain size than for ClB-amorph and ClB/NtB samples. There is no question that increasing the ag- gregated/crystalline content of the P3HT increases the device efficiency. What we have shown here is that not only must the P3HT domains be crystalline, they must also be connected into a network for charge transport and they must also be formed during the spin coating process so that the PCBM is not completely excluded from the aggregated network. Exclu- sion of PCBM leads to reduced charge separation and re- duced efficiency.
Experimental
All of the solar cells in this work were prepared on commercial ITO-coated glass with layer thickness ∼140 nm and 15 O sheet resis- tance (Merck). The ITO was etched with acid and subsequently cleaned using chloroform, acetone, Mucasol detergent, and deionized water in an ultrasonic bath. The cleaned ITO samples were exposed to ozone for 10 min and immediately spin coated with 31 nm of PED- OT:PSS (Baytron P AL 4083, HC Stark). The PEDOT:PSS-coated samples were heat-treated at 110 °C for 3 min and then moved to a N 2 glove box for the remainder of the fabrication and measurement. The ClB and OX polymer solutions were stirred overnight at 60 °C before spin coating to ensure that the polymer had been completely dissolved. The active layer of the solar cells was spin-coated from a 3:2 mixture of P3HT (Aldrich, reported regioregularity > 98.5%) and PCBM (Nano-C), because this ratio was determined to be best for a 80 nm active layer thickness.[31]^ The P3HT was cleaned twice prior to making the final solution by dissolving the polymer into ClB and crashing the polymer into a 7:1 methanol–water solution dropwise, followed by filtration. After spin-coating of the active layer, the sam- ples were moved to a high vacuum chamber (∼ 10 -6^ mbar), where an electrode of 5 nm Ca and 150 nm Ag was vapor-deposited through a mask, leaving 7 solar cells with an active area of 0.0785 cm 2. After metal deposition, the samples were either directly measured or tem- pered for 10 min at various temperatures (see Fig. S4) in N 2 atmo- sphere. OX-np dispersions were made by heating over night and then continued stirring at room temperature for several days (2–14) before spin-coating. We did not conduct a systematic study to determine the rate of nanofiber formation. The I–V curves of the samples were measured using a Keithley 2425 source measurement unit in an N 2 glove box. AM1.5 illumina- tion at 100 mW cm-2^ was provided by a filtered Xe lamp and calibrat- ed by using a calibrated solar cell from the Frauenhofer institute for solar research (Freiburg, Germany). Sample thickness was deter- mined using a Dektak surface profiler that was calibrated to a Si–SiO 2 ellipsometry standard. Sample thicknesses were double-checked using AFM. AFM measurements were performed on a SIS pico-station mode microscope in tapping mode. All images were acquired with 512 × 512 points and a measuring speed of 0.9 s line -1. UV-vis mea- surements were performed on a Varian Cary spectrometer. Dynamic light-scattering measurements of particle size in solution were per- formed with a Malvern Zetasizer device. The SEM image was mea- sured using a field emission Zeiss Supra 40VP with a 2 kV accelera- tion voltage and an in-line detector. Received: June 25, 2007 Revised: August 2, 2007 Published online: December 20, 2007
[1] G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emery, Y. Yang, Nat. Mater. 2005 , 4 , 864.
COMMUNICATION
244 www.advmat.de © 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Mater. 2008 , 20 , 240–