D265 Notes Critical thinking, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Philosophy

D265 Notes Critical thinkingD265 Notes Critical thinking

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2024/2025

Available from 02/27/2025

mindshaper
mindshaper 🇺🇸

1.3K documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
D265 Notes Critical thinking
critical Thinking Terms:
Premise The statements being offered in support of the conclusion.
Conclusion is the statement being argued for.
Non–Propositions are not statements about matters of fact (or
fiction). They do not make a claim that can be true or false.
Deductive Arguments Arguments where the premises
guarantee or necessitate the conclusion. Leaves no question or
possibility.
o
Example: All rabbits have long ears. Bugs is a rabbit.
Consequently, Bugs has long ears.
Inductive Arguments Arguments where the premises make
the conclusion probable. (I think)
o
Example: Because most penguins are from areas with cold
climates, it is probable that the penguin you saw at the zoo was
from an area with a cold climate.
Abduction Arguments Arguments where the best available
explanation is chosen as the correct explanation.
Validity In a good deductive argument structure, true premises
make the conclusion necessarily true.
o
Example: When I went outside this morning, the grass was
completely covered with dew. It must have rained last night.
Valid Argument It is not possible that the conclusion is false
when the premises are true.
o
Example: Ralph is a dog. No dogs are allowed on the roller-
coaster. Therefore, Ralph is not allowed on the roller-coaster.
Invalid Argument An argument is invalid when its conclusion is not
proven by its premises.
o
Example: If I am President then I am famous. I am not
President. Therefore, I am not famous.
Sound Argument A sound argument is valid and has true premises.
o
Example: All whales are mammals. Killer Whale is a whale.
Therefore, Killer whale is a mammal.
o
Example: All Planets in our solar system orbit the sun. Mars is a
planet in our solar system. Therefore, Mars orbits the Sun.
Unsound Argument An argument is unsound when it is either
invalid or has one or more false premises.
o
Example: All dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are
cows. CONGENCY
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download D265 Notes Critical thinking and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

D265 Notes Critical thinking

critical Thinking Terms:

  • Premise – The statements being offered in support of the conclusion.
  • Conclusion – is the statement being argued for.
  • Non–Propositions – are not statements about matters of fact (or fiction). They do not make a claim that can be true or false.
  • Deductive Arguments – Arguments where the premises guarantee or necessitate the conclusion. Leaves no question or possibility. o Example: All rabbits have long ears. Bugs is a rabbit. Consequently, Bugs has long ears.
  • Inductive Arguments – Arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable. (I think) o Example: Because most penguins are from areas with cold climates, it is probable that the penguin you saw at the zoo was from an area with a cold climate.
  • Abduction Arguments – Arguments where the best available explanation is chosen as the correct explanation.
  • Validity – In a good deductive argument structure, true premises make the conclusion necessarily true. o Example: When I went outside this morning, the grass was completely covered with dew. It must have rained last night.
  • Valid Argument – It is not possible that the conclusion is false when the premises are true. o Example: Ralph is a dog. No dogs are allowed on the roller- coaster. Therefore, Ralph is not allowed on the roller-coaster.
  • Invalid Argument – An argument is invalid when its conclusion is not proven by its premises. o Example: If I am President then I am famous. I am not President. Therefore, I am not famous.
  • Sound Argument – A sound argument is valid and has true premises. o Example: All whales are mammals. Killer Whale is a whale. Therefore, Killer whale is a mammal. o Example: All Planets in our solar system orbit the sun. Mars is a planet in our solar system. Therefore, Mars orbits the Sun.
  • Unsound Argument – An argument is unsound when it is either invalid or has one or more false premises. o Example: All dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are cows. CONGENCY

- Oncogene Argument – There are three ways in which an argument can be oncogene: 1. It is weak: I am 40 years old. I have had oxygen to breath my whole life. Therefore, tomorrow I will not have oxygen to breathe. 2. The premises are false: All asteroids observed so far have contained chocolate fudge inside of them. Therefore, the next asteroid to be observed will also contain chocolate fudge inside of it.

  • Appeal to Authority – the arguer claims an authority figure’s expertise to support a claim despite this expertise being irrelevant or overstated.
  • Hasty Generalization – happens when someone uses inductive reasoning with evidence or a sample size that’s too small to prove their point. Conclusions based on insufficient or biased evidence.

o The car that just cut me off is from South Dakota, so all South Dakotans are jerks.

  • Slippery Slope – This is the baseless assumption that once someone has taken a step, the next steps automatically occur.
  • Red Herring – Something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question.
  • Begging the Question – Occurs when an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion.
  • Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc – is an informal fallacy that states: “Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.” o Example: Nearly all heroin addicts used marijuana before they tried heroin. Clearly, marijuana use leads to heroin addiction.”
  • Equivocation – Occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. o Example: I have the right to watch “the Real World.” Therefore, it’s right for me to watch the show. o Example: Salad is healthy, and taco salad is a salad. Therefore, taco salad is healthy.
  • False Dichotomy – This fallacy takes a complex topic and falsely asserts that there are only two possible explanations, when in fact more explanations exist. (Black and White Thinking)
  • The Fallacy fallacy – is when a claim has been poorly argued that the claim itself must be wrong.
  • Genetic Fallacy – This fallacy arises whenever we dismiss a claim or argument because of its origin or history. o Example: My parents told me that God exists; therefore, God exists. o Example: My sixth-grade teacher, Mr. Harris, said that all women are bad drivers, so it must be true.
  • Texas Sharpshooter fallacy – where an argument is made and confirmed using the exact same set of information. Instead of looking at evidence and letting it determine what conclusion we develop, we’re letting our fixed conclusion determine how we treat the evidence (which is backwards).
  • Burden of Proof shifting - CONSIDERING SOURCES OF INFORMATION
  1. Is the website merely a host for people to post their own essays?
  2. Is it someone’s personal blog?
  1. Is it biased? All sources have come kind of bias, but some are more credible than others.
  2. Is it thoughtful and honest? they are less likely just to be promoting a particular ideology. If not, then they are more likely to be doing so.
  3. Who funded it? Be distrustful of a study that has a vested interest in finding a particular outcome.
  4. Does it try to get you to distrust “the others”?
  5. Is it current? Is it local? Time and dates are important.
  6. What are others saying about it? Another way of safeguarding against being duped by false information is to look at the same news story or piece of information from multiple independent sources.
  7. Is it plausible? Go forward with researching the claims further through independent reliable sources only when you have decided it is at least plausible enough to warrant further investigation.
  8. Is it convenient? Sometimes the truth really does fit a particular narrative, but the more neatly and tidily it does, the more skeptical you should be.
  9. Is it possible that it is a deepfake? People using machine learning technology can create images, voices, and even videos, and at some point, distinguishing which videos are fake may become impossible. TYPES OF BIASES
  • Principle of Charity – Treat people like they’re intelligent to better evaluate their arguments. It suggests we should try to understand ideas before we disregard them. It is morally right to give others the benefit of the doubt. It allows for a clearer understanding of the issue.
  • Confirmation bias – People’s tendency to process information by looking for, or interpreting, information that is consistent with their existing beliefs. o Example: Some people point to the large number of unidentified flying object sightings and the discovery of many earth-like planets in the universe as evidence of extraterrestrial life. I don’t take this evidence seriously though, because I do not believe in extraterrestrial life.
  • Cognitive bias – refers to the systemic ways in which people categorize and make sense of the world to make judgments and decisions.
  • Heuristics – Mental shortcuts for solving problems in a quick way that delivers a result that is sufficient enough to be useful given time constraints.
  • Availability Heuristic – A process where the mind generalizes based on what is available to it rather than what is objectively true.
  • Representative Heuristic – is a cognitive bias in which an individual categorizes a new situation based on the nearest prototype or experience in their mind.
  • Anchoring Bias – Occurs when a person arbitrarily emphasizes one piece of evidence or experience (usually the first one) over other relevant pieces of evidence or experience.