Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


solutions to elementary linear algebra, Notas de estudo de Engenharia Elétrica

solutions to elementary linear algebra

Tipologia: Notas de estudo

2013
Em oferta
50 Pontos
Discount

Oferta por tempo limitado


Compartilhado em 10/01/2013

fabio-tanaka-12
fabio-tanaka-12 🇧🇷

4.8

(57)

34 documentos

1 / 100

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
ELEMENTARY
LINEAR ALGEBRA
K. R. MATTHEWS
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND
First Printing, 1991
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64
Discount

Em oferta

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe solutions to elementary linear algebra e outras Notas de estudo em PDF para Engenharia Elétrica, somente na Docsity!

SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS

ELEMENTARY

LINEAR ALGEBRA

K. R. MATTHEWS

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS

UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND

First Printing, 1991

CONTENTS

  • PROBLEMS 1.6
  • PROBLEMS 2.4
  • PROBLEMS 2.7
  • PROBLEMS 3.6
  • PROBLEMS 4.1
  • PROBLEMS 5.8
  • PROBLEMS 6.3
  • PROBLEMS 7.3
  • PROBLEMS 8.8

(c)

 R^1 ↔^ R^3

R 2 → R 2 − 2 R 1

R 3 → R 3 − 3 R 1

R 4 → R 4 − 6 R 1

R 1 → R 1 + R 2

R 4 → R 4 − R 3

R 3 → R 3 − 2 R 2

The augmented matrix has been converted to reduced row–echelon form and we read off the complete solution x = − 12 − 3 z, y = − 32 − 2 z, with z arbitrary.

2 − 1 3 a 3 1 − 5 b − 5 − 5 21 c

 R 2 → R 2 − R 1

2 − 1 3 a 1 2 − 8 b − a − 5 − 5 21 c

R 1 ↔ R 2

1 2 − 8 b − a 2 − 1 3 a − 5 − 5 21 c

 R^2 →^ R^2 −^2 R^1

R 3 → R 3 + 5R 1

1 2 − 8 b − a 0 − 5 19 − 2 b + 3a 0 5 − 19 5 b − 5 a + c

R 3 → R 3 + R 2

R 2 → − 51 R 2

1 2 − 8 b − a 0 1 − 519 2 b− 53 a 0 0 0 3 b − 2 a + c

R 1 → R 1 − 2 R 2

1 0 − 52 (b+ 5 a) 0 1 − 519 2 b− 53 a 0 0 0 3 b − 2 a + c

From the last matrix we see that the original system is inconsistent if 3 b − 2 a + c 6 = 0. If 3b − 2 a + c = 0, the system is consistent and the solution is

x = (b + a) 5

z, y = (2b − 3 a) 5

z,

where z is arbitrary.

t 1 t 1 + t 2 3

 R^2 →^ R^2 −^ tR^1 R 3 → R 3 − (1 + t)R 1

0 1 − t 0 0 1 − t 2 − t

R 3 → R 3 − R 2

0 1 − t 0 0 0 2 − t

 = B.

Case 1. t 6 = 2. No solution.

Case 2. t = 2. B =

We read off the unique solution x = 1, y = 0.

  1. Method 1.

  

R 1 → R 1 − R 4

R 2 → R 2 − R 4

R 3 → R 3 − R 4

 R^4 →^ R^4 −^ R^3 −^ R^2 −^ R^1

Hence the given homogeneous system has complete solution x 1 = x 4 , x 2 = x 4 , x 3 = x 4 , with x 4 arbitrary. Method 2. Write the system as x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 1 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 2 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 3 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 4. Then it is immediate that any solution must satisfy x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4. Conversely, if x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 satisfy x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 , we get a solution.

[ λ − 3 1 1 λ − 3

]

R 1 ↔ R 2

[

1 λ − 3 λ − 3 1

]

R 2 → R 2 − (λ − 3)R 1

[

1 λ − 3 0 −λ^2 + 6λ − 8

]

= B.

Case 1: −λ^2 + 6λ − 8 6 = 0. That is −(λ − 2)(λ − 4) 6 = 0 or λ 6 = 2, 4. Here B is

row equivalent to

[

]

R 2 → (^) −λ (^2) +6^1 λ− 8 R 2

[

1 λ − 3 0 1

]

R 1 → R 1 − (λ − 3)R 2

[

]

Hence we get the trivial solution x = 0, y = 0.

with xn arbitrary. Alternatively, writing the system in the form

x 1 + · · · + xn = nx 1 x 1 + · · · + xn = nx 2 .. . x 1 + · · · + xn = nxn

shows that any solution must satisfy nx 1 = nx 2 = · · · = nxn, so x 1 = x 2 = · · · = xn. Conversely if x 1 = xn,... , xn− 1 = xn, we see that x 1 ,... , xn is a solution.

  1. Let A =

[

a b c d

]

and assume that ad − bc 6 = 0.

Case 1: a 6 = 0. [ a b c d

]

R 1 → (^1) a R 1

[

1 b a c d

]

R 2 → R 2 − cR 1

[

(^1) ab 0 ad− abc

]

R 2 → (^) ada−bc R 2

[

(^1) ab 0 1

]

R 1 → R 1 − (^) ab R 2

[

]

Case 2: a = 0. Then bc 6 = 0 and hence c 6 = 0.

A =

[

0 b c d

]

R 1 ↔ R 2

[

c d 0 b

]

[

1 d c 0 1

]

[

]

So in both cases, A has reduced row–echelon form equal to

[

]

  1. We simplify the augmented matrix of the system using row operations:  

4 1 a^2 − 14 a + 2

 R^2 →^ R^2 −^3 R^1

R 3 → R 3 − 4 R 1

0 − 7 a^2 − 2 a − 14

R 3 → R 3 − R 2

R 2 → − 71 R 2

R 1 → R 1 − 2 R 2

0 0 a^2 − 16 a − 4

 R 1 → R 1 − 2 R 2

0 0 a^2 − 16 a − 4

Denote the last matrix by B.

Case 1: a^2 − 16 6 = 0. i.e. a 6 = ±4. Then

R 3 → (^) a (^2) −^116 R 3 R 1 → R 1 − R 3 R 2 → R 2 + 2R 3

(^1 0 0) 7(^8 aa+25+4) (^0 1 0 10) 7(aa+54+4) (^0 0 1) a+4^1

and we get the unique solution

x =

8 a + 25 7(a + 4) , y =

10 a + 54 7(a + 4) , z =

a + 4

Case 2: a = −4. Then B =

, so our system is inconsistent.

Case 3: a = 4. Then B =

. We read off that the system is

consistent, with complete solution x = 87 − z, y = 107 + 2z, where z is arbitrary.

  1. We reduce the augmented array of the system to reduced row–echelon form:    

 R^3 →^ R^3 +^ R^1

R 3 → R 3 + R 2

R 1 → R 1 + R 4

R 3 ↔ R 4

The last matrix is in reduced row–echelon form and we read off the solution of the corresponding homogeneous system:

x 1 = −x 4 − x 5 = x 4 + x 5 x 2 = −x 4 − x 5 = x 4 + x 5 x 3 = −x 4 = x 4 ,

  1. Suppose that (α 1 ,... , αn) and (β 1 ,... , βn) are solutions of the system of linear equations ∑n

j=

aij xj = bi, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.

Then (^) n ∑

j=

aij αj = bi and

∑^ n

j=

aij βj = bi

for 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Let γi = (1 − t)αi + tβi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Then (γ 1 ,... , γn) is a solution of the given system. For

∑^ n

j=

aij γj =

∑^ n

j=

aij {(1 − t)αj + tβj }

∑^ n

j=

aij (1 − t)αj +

∑^ n

j=

aij tβj

= (1 − t)bi + tbi = bi.

  1. Suppose that (α 1 ,... , αn) is a solution of the system of linear equations

∑^ n

j=

aij xj = bi, 1 ≤ i ≤ m. (1)

Then the system can be rewritten as

∑^ n

j=

aij xj =

∑^ n

j=

aij αj , 1 ≤ i ≤ m,

or equivalently ∑n

j=

aij (xj − αj ) = 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.

So we have (^) n ∑

j=

aij yj = 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.

where xj − αj = yj. Hence xj = αj + yj , 1 ≤ j ≤ n, where (y 1 ,... , yn) is a solution of the associated homogeneous system. Conversely if (y 1 ,... , yn)

is a solution of the associated homogeneous system and xj = αj + yj , 1 ≤ j ≤ n, then reversing the argument shows that (x 1 ,... , xn) is a solution of the system 1.

  1. We simplify the augmented matrix using row operations, working to- wards row–echelon form:  

a 1 1 1 b 3 2 0 a 1 + a

 R^2 →^ R^2 −^ aR^1 R 3 → R 3 − 3 R 1

0 1 − a 1 + a 1 − a b − a 0 − 1 3 a − 3 a − 2

R 2 ↔ R 3

R 2 → −R 2

0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 1 − a 1 + a 1 − a b − a

R 3 → R 3 + (a − 1)R 2

0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 0 4 − 2 a (1 − a)(a − 2) −a^2 + 2a + b − 2

 = B.

Case 1: a 6 = 2. Then 4 − 2 a 6 = 0 and

B →

0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 0 1 a− 21 −a (^2) +2a+b− 2 4 − 2 a

Hence we can solve for x, y and z in terms of the arbitrary variable w.

Case 2: a = 2. Then

B =

0 0 0 0 b − 2

Hence there is no solution if b 6 = 2. However if b = 2, then

B =

and we get the solution x = 1 − 2 z, y = 3z − w, where w is arbitrary.

  1. (a) We first prove that 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 0. Observe that the elements

1 + 0, 1 + 1, 1 + a, 1 + b

R 2 ↔ R 3

1 a b a 0 b a 0 0 0 a a

 R^2 →^ aR^2 R 3 → bR 3

1 a b a 0 1 b 0 0 0 1 1

R 1 ↔ R 1 + aR 2

1 0 a a 0 1 b 0 0 0 1 1

 R^1 →^ R^1 +^ aR^3 R 2 → R 2 + bR 3

0 1 0 b 0 0 1 1

The last matrix is in reduced row–echelon form.

Section 2. 4

  1. Suppose B =

a b c d e f

 (^) and that AB = I 2. Then

[

] 

a b c d e f

[

]

[

−a + e −b + f c + e d + f

]

Hence −a + e = 1 c + e = 0 , −b^ +^ f^ = 0 d + f = 1

e = a + 1 c = −e = −(a + 1) ,^

f = b d = 1 − f = 1 − b ;

B =

a b −a − 1 1 − b a + 1 b

Next,

(BA)^2 B = (BA)(BA)B = B(AB)(AB) = BI 2 I 2 = BI 2 = B

  1. Let pn denote the statement

An^ = (

n−1) 2 A^ +^

(3− 3 n) 2 I^2.

Then p 1 asserts that A = (3− 2 1)A + (3− 2 3)I 2 , which is true. So let n ≥ 1 and assume pn. Then from (1),

An+1^ = A · An^ = A

(3n−1) 2 A^ +^

(3− 3 n) 2 I^2

n−1) 2 A

(^2) + (3−^3 n) 2 A = (

n−1) 2 (4A^ −^3 I^2 ) +^

(3− 3 n) 2 A^ =^

(3n−1)4+(3− 3 n) 2 A^ +^

(3n−1)(−3) 2 I^2 = (4·^3

n− 3 n)− 1 2 A^ +^

(3− 3 n+1) 2 I^2 = (

n+1−1) 2 A^ +^

(3− 3 n+1) 2 I^2.

Hence pn+1 is true and the induction proceeds.

  1. The equation xn+1 = axn + bxn− 1 is seen to be equivalent to [ xn+ xn

]

[

a b 1 0

] [

xn xn− 1

]

If λ 1 6 = λ 2 , we see that

(λ 1 − λ 2 )kn = (λ 1 − λ 2 )(λn 1 −^1 + λn 1 −^2 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^2 + λn 2 − 1 ) = λn 1 + λn 1 −^1 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^1 −(λn 1 −^1 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^1 + λn 2 ) = λn 1 − λn 2.

Hence kn = λ

n 1 −λn 2 λ 1 −λ 2.

We have to prove An^ = knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2. ∗ n=1:

A^1 = A; also k 1 A − λ 1 λ 2 k 0 I 2 = k 1 A − λ 1 λ 20 I 2 = A.

Let n ≥ 1 and assume equation ∗ holds. Then

An+1^ = An^ · A = (knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2 )A = knA^2 − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 A.

Now A^2 = (a + d)A − (ad − bc)I 2 = (λ 1 + λ 2 )A − λ 1 λ 2 I 2. Hence

An+1^ = kn(λ 1 + λ 2 )A − λ 1 λ 2 I 2 − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 A = {kn(λ 1 + λ 2 ) − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 }A − λ 1 λ 2 knI 2 = kn+1A − λ 1 λ 2 knI 2 ,

and the induction goes through.

  1. Here λ 1 , λ 2 are the roots of the polynomial x^2 − 2 x − 3 = (x − 3)(x + 1). So we can take λ 1 = 3, λ 2 = − 1. Then

kn = 3 n^ − (−1)n 3 − (−1)

3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4

Hence

An^ =

3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4

A − (−3)

3 n−^1 + (−1)n 4

I 2

3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4

[

]

3 n−^1 + (−1)n 4

} [

]

which is equivalent to the stated result.

  1. In terms of matrices, we have [ Fn+ Fn

]

[

] [

Fn Fn− 1

]

for n ≥ 1.

[ Fn+ Fn

]

[

]n [ F 1 F 0

]

[

]n [ 1 0

]

Now λ 1 , λ 2 are the roots of the polynomial x^2 − x − 1 here. Hence λ 1 = 1+

√ 5 2 and^ λ^2 =^

1 − √ 5 2 and

kn =

1+√ 5 2

)n− 1 −

1 −√ 5 2

)n− 1

1+ √ 5 2 −

1 − √ 5 2

1+√ 5 2

)n− 1 −

1 −√ 5 2

)n− 1

√ 5

Hence

An^ = knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2 = knA + kn− 1 I 2

So [ Fn+ Fn

]

= (knA + kn− 1 I 2 )

[

]

= kn

[

]

  • kn− 1

[

]

[

kn + kn− 1 kn

]

Hence

Fn = kn =

1+ √ 5 2

)n− 1 −

1 − √ 5 2

)n− 1

√ 5

  1. From Question 5, we know that [ xn yn

]

[

1 r 1 1

]n [ a b

]

Section 2. 7

1. [A|I 2 ] =

[

]

R 2 → R 2 + 3R 1

[

]

R 2 → 131 R 2

[

]

R 1 → R 1 − 4 R 2

[

∣∣ 1 /^13 −^4 /^13

]

Hence A is non–singular and A−^1 =

[

]

Moreover E 12 (−4)E 2 (1/13)E 21 (3)A = I 2 ,

so A−^1 = E 12 (−4)E 2 (1/13)E 21 (3).

Hence

A = {E 21 (3)}−^1 {E 2 (1/13)}−^1 {E 12 (−4)}−^1 = E 21 (−3)E 2 (13)E 12 (4).

  1. Let D = [dij ] be an m × m diagonal matrix and let A = [ajk] be an m × n matrix. Then

(DA)ik =

∑^ n

j=

dij ajk = diiaik,

as dij = 0 if i 6 = j. It follows that the ith row of DA is obtained by multiplying the ith row of A by dii. Similarly, post–multiplication of a matrix by a diagonal matrix D results in a matrix whose columns are those of A, multiplied by the respective diagonal elements of D. In particular,

diag (a 1 ,... , an)diag (b 1 ,... , bn) = diag (a 1 b 1 ,... , anbn),

as the left–hand side can be regarded as pre–multiplication of the matrix diag (b 1 ,... , bn) by the diagonal matrix diag (a 1 ,... , an). Finally, suppose that each of a 1 ,... , an is non–zero. Then a− 1 1 ,... , a− n^1 all exist and we have

diag (a 1 ,... , an)diag (a− 1 1 ,... , a− n 1 ) = diag (a 1 a− 1 1 ,... , ana− n 1 ) = diag (1,... , 1) = In.

Hence diag (a 1 ,... , an) is non–singular and its inverse is diag (a− 1 1 ,... , a− n 1 ).

Next suppose that ai = 0. Then diag (a 1 ,... , an) is row–equivalent to a matix containing a zero row and is hence singular.

3. [A|I 3 ] =

 R 1 ↔ R 2

R 3 → R 3 − 3 R 1

 R 2 ↔ R 3

R 3 → 12 R 3

 R 1 → R 1 − 2 R 2

R 1 → R 1 − 24 R 3

R 2 → R 2 + 9R 3

Hence A is non–singular and A−^1 =

Also

E 23 (9)E 13 (−24)E 12 (−2)E 3 (1/2)E 23 E 31 (−3)E 12 A = I 3.

Hence

A−^1 = E 23 (9)E 13 (−24)E 12 (−2)E 3 (1/2)E 23 E 31 (−3)E 12 ,

so A = E 12 E 31 (3)E 23 E 3 (2)E 12 (2)E 13 (24)E 23 (−9).

A =

1 2 k 3 − 1 1 5 3 − 5

1 2 k 0 − 7 1 − 3 k 0 − 7 − 5 − 5 k

1 2 k 0 − 7 1 − 3 k 0 0 − 6 − 2 k

 = B.

Hence if − 6 − 2 k 6 = 0, i.e. if k 6 = −3, we see that B can be reduced to I 3 and hence A is non–singular.

If k = −3, then B =

 (^) = B and consequently A is singu-

lar, as it is row–equivalent to a matrix containing a zero row.