




























































































Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Encontra documentos específicos para os exames da tua universidade
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
solutions to elementary linear algebra
Tipologia: Notas de estudo
Oferta por tempo limitado
Compartilhado em 10/01/2013
4.8
(57)34 documentos
1 / 100
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!





























































































Em oferta
First Printing, 1991
(c)
The augmented matrix has been converted to reduced row–echelon form and we read off the complete solution x = − 12 − 3 z, y = − 32 − 2 z, with z arbitrary.
2 − 1 3 a 3 1 − 5 b − 5 − 5 21 c
2 − 1 3 a 1 2 − 8 b − a − 5 − 5 21 c
1 2 − 8 b − a 2 − 1 3 a − 5 − 5 21 c
1 2 − 8 b − a 0 − 5 19 − 2 b + 3a 0 5 − 19 5 b − 5 a + c
1 2 − 8 b − a 0 1 − 519 2 b− 53 a 0 0 0 3 b − 2 a + c
1 0 − 52 (b+ 5 a) 0 1 − 519 2 b− 53 a 0 0 0 3 b − 2 a + c
From the last matrix we see that the original system is inconsistent if 3 b − 2 a + c 6 = 0. If 3b − 2 a + c = 0, the system is consistent and the solution is
x = (b + a) 5
z, y = (2b − 3 a) 5
z,
where z is arbitrary.
t 1 t 1 + t 2 3
R^2 →^ R^2 −^ tR^1 R 3 → R 3 − (1 + t)R 1
0 1 − t 0 0 1 − t 2 − t
0 1 − t 0 0 0 2 − t
Case 1. t 6 = 2. No solution.
Case 2. t = 2. B =
We read off the unique solution x = 1, y = 0.
Hence the given homogeneous system has complete solution x 1 = x 4 , x 2 = x 4 , x 3 = x 4 , with x 4 arbitrary. Method 2. Write the system as x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 1 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 2 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 3 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 x 4. Then it is immediate that any solution must satisfy x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4. Conversely, if x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 satisfy x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 , we get a solution.
[ λ − 3 1 1 λ − 3
1 λ − 3 λ − 3 1
R 2 → R 2 − (λ − 3)R 1
1 λ − 3 0 −λ^2 + 6λ − 8
Case 1: −λ^2 + 6λ − 8 6 = 0. That is −(λ − 2)(λ − 4) 6 = 0 or λ 6 = 2, 4. Here B is
row equivalent to
R 2 → (^) −λ (^2) +6^1 λ− 8 R 2
1 λ − 3 0 1
R 1 → R 1 − (λ − 3)R 2
Hence we get the trivial solution x = 0, y = 0.
with xn arbitrary. Alternatively, writing the system in the form
x 1 + · · · + xn = nx 1 x 1 + · · · + xn = nx 2 .. . x 1 + · · · + xn = nxn
shows that any solution must satisfy nx 1 = nx 2 = · · · = nxn, so x 1 = x 2 = · · · = xn. Conversely if x 1 = xn,... , xn− 1 = xn, we see that x 1 ,... , xn is a solution.
a b c d
and assume that ad − bc 6 = 0.
Case 1: a 6 = 0. [ a b c d
R 1 → (^1) a R 1
1 b a c d
R 2 → R 2 − cR 1
(^1) ab 0 ad− abc
R 2 → (^) ada−bc R 2
(^1) ab 0 1
R 1 → R 1 − (^) ab R 2
Case 2: a = 0. Then bc 6 = 0 and hence c 6 = 0.
0 b c d
c d 0 b
1 d c 0 1
So in both cases, A has reduced row–echelon form equal to
4 1 a^2 − 14 a + 2
0 − 7 a^2 − 2 a − 14
0 0 a^2 − 16 a − 4
0 0 a^2 − 16 a − 4
Denote the last matrix by B.
Case 1: a^2 − 16 6 = 0. i.e. a 6 = ±4. Then
R 3 → (^) a (^2) −^116 R 3 R 1 → R 1 − R 3 R 2 → R 2 + 2R 3
(^1 0 0) 7(^8 aa+25+4) (^0 1 0 10) 7(aa+54+4) (^0 0 1) a+4^1
and we get the unique solution
x =
8 a + 25 7(a + 4) , y =
10 a + 54 7(a + 4) , z =
a + 4
Case 2: a = −4. Then B =
, so our system is inconsistent.
Case 3: a = 4. Then B =
. We read off that the system is
consistent, with complete solution x = 87 − z, y = 107 + 2z, where z is arbitrary.
The last matrix is in reduced row–echelon form and we read off the solution of the corresponding homogeneous system:
x 1 = −x 4 − x 5 = x 4 + x 5 x 2 = −x 4 − x 5 = x 4 + x 5 x 3 = −x 4 = x 4 ,
j=
aij xj = bi, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.
Then (^) n ∑
j=
aij αj = bi and
∑^ n
j=
aij βj = bi
for 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Let γi = (1 − t)αi + tβi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Then (γ 1 ,... , γn) is a solution of the given system. For
∑^ n
j=
aij γj =
∑^ n
j=
aij {(1 − t)αj + tβj }
∑^ n
j=
aij (1 − t)αj +
∑^ n
j=
aij tβj
= (1 − t)bi + tbi = bi.
∑^ n
j=
aij xj = bi, 1 ≤ i ≤ m. (1)
Then the system can be rewritten as
∑^ n
j=
aij xj =
∑^ n
j=
aij αj , 1 ≤ i ≤ m,
or equivalently ∑n
j=
aij (xj − αj ) = 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.
So we have (^) n ∑
j=
aij yj = 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ m.
where xj − αj = yj. Hence xj = αj + yj , 1 ≤ j ≤ n, where (y 1 ,... , yn) is a solution of the associated homogeneous system. Conversely if (y 1 ,... , yn)
is a solution of the associated homogeneous system and xj = αj + yj , 1 ≤ j ≤ n, then reversing the argument shows that (x 1 ,... , xn) is a solution of the system 1.
a 1 1 1 b 3 2 0 a 1 + a
R^2 →^ R^2 −^ aR^1 R 3 → R 3 − 3 R 1
0 1 − a 1 + a 1 − a b − a 0 − 1 3 a − 3 a − 2
0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 1 − a 1 + a 1 − a b − a
R 3 → R 3 + (a − 1)R 2
0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 0 4 − 2 a (1 − a)(a − 2) −a^2 + 2a + b − 2
Case 1: a 6 = 2. Then 4 − 2 a 6 = 0 and
0 1 − 3 3 − a 2 − a 0 0 1 a− 21 −a (^2) +2a+b− 2 4 − 2 a
Hence we can solve for x, y and z in terms of the arbitrary variable w.
Case 2: a = 2. Then
B =
0 0 0 0 b − 2
Hence there is no solution if b 6 = 2. However if b = 2, then
and we get the solution x = 1 − 2 z, y = 3z − w, where w is arbitrary.
1 + 0, 1 + 1, 1 + a, 1 + b
1 a b a 0 b a 0 0 0 a a
R^2 →^ aR^2 R 3 → bR 3
1 a b a 0 1 b 0 0 0 1 1
R 1 ↔ R 1 + aR 2
1 0 a a 0 1 b 0 0 0 1 1
R^1 →^ R^1 +^ aR^3 R 2 → R 2 + bR 3
0 1 0 b 0 0 1 1
The last matrix is in reduced row–echelon form.
a b c d e f
(^) and that AB = I 2. Then
a b c d e f
−a + e −b + f c + e d + f
Hence −a + e = 1 c + e = 0 , −b^ +^ f^ = 0 d + f = 1
e = a + 1 c = −e = −(a + 1) ,^
f = b d = 1 − f = 1 − b ;
a b −a − 1 1 − b a + 1 b
Next,
(BA)^2 B = (BA)(BA)B = B(AB)(AB) = BI 2 I 2 = BI 2 = B
An^ = (
n−1) 2 A^ +^
(3− 3 n) 2 I^2.
Then p 1 asserts that A = (3− 2 1)A + (3− 2 3)I 2 , which is true. So let n ≥ 1 and assume pn. Then from (1),
An+1^ = A · An^ = A
(3n−1) 2 A^ +^
(3− 3 n) 2 I^2
n−1) 2 A
(^2) + (3−^3 n) 2 A = (
n−1) 2 (4A^ −^3 I^2 ) +^
(3− 3 n) 2 A^ =^
(3n−1)4+(3− 3 n) 2 A^ +^
(3n−1)(−3) 2 I^2 = (4·^3
n− 3 n)− 1 2 A^ +^
(3− 3 n+1) 2 I^2 = (
n+1−1) 2 A^ +^
(3− 3 n+1) 2 I^2.
Hence pn+1 is true and the induction proceeds.
a b 1 0
xn xn− 1
If λ 1 6 = λ 2 , we see that
(λ 1 − λ 2 )kn = (λ 1 − λ 2 )(λn 1 −^1 + λn 1 −^2 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^2 + λn 2 − 1 ) = λn 1 + λn 1 −^1 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^1 −(λn 1 −^1 λ 2 + · · · + λ 1 λn 2 −^1 + λn 2 ) = λn 1 − λn 2.
Hence kn = λ
n 1 −λn 2 λ 1 −λ 2.
We have to prove An^ = knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2. ∗ n=1:
A^1 = A; also k 1 A − λ 1 λ 2 k 0 I 2 = k 1 A − λ 1 λ 20 I 2 = A.
Let n ≥ 1 and assume equation ∗ holds. Then
An+1^ = An^ · A = (knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2 )A = knA^2 − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 A.
Now A^2 = (a + d)A − (ad − bc)I 2 = (λ 1 + λ 2 )A − λ 1 λ 2 I 2. Hence
An+1^ = kn(λ 1 + λ 2 )A − λ 1 λ 2 I 2 − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 A = {kn(λ 1 + λ 2 ) − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 }A − λ 1 λ 2 knI 2 = kn+1A − λ 1 λ 2 knI 2 ,
and the induction goes through.
kn = 3 n^ − (−1)n 3 − (−1)
3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4
Hence
An^ =
3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4
3 n−^1 + (−1)n 4
3 n^ + (−1)n+ 4
3 n−^1 + (−1)n 4
which is equivalent to the stated result.
Fn Fn− 1
for n ≥ 1.
[ Fn+ Fn
]n [ F 1 F 0
]n [ 1 0
Now λ 1 , λ 2 are the roots of the polynomial x^2 − x − 1 here. Hence λ 1 = 1+
√ 5 2 and^ λ^2 =^
1 − √ 5 2 and
kn =
1+√ 5 2
)n− 1 −
1 −√ 5 2
)n− 1
1+ √ 5 2 −
1 − √ 5 2
1+√ 5 2
)n− 1 −
1 −√ 5 2
)n− 1
√ 5
Hence
An^ = knA − λ 1 λ 2 kn− 1 I 2 = knA + kn− 1 I 2
So [ Fn+ Fn
= (knA + kn− 1 I 2 )
= kn
kn + kn− 1 kn
Hence
Fn = kn =
1+ √ 5 2
)n− 1 −
1 − √ 5 2
)n− 1
√ 5
1 r 1 1
]n [ a b
Hence A is non–singular and A−^1 =
Moreover E 12 (−4)E 2 (1/13)E 21 (3)A = I 2 ,
so A−^1 = E 12 (−4)E 2 (1/13)E 21 (3).
Hence
A = {E 21 (3)}−^1 {E 2 (1/13)}−^1 {E 12 (−4)}−^1 = E 21 (−3)E 2 (13)E 12 (4).
(DA)ik =
∑^ n
j=
dij ajk = diiaik,
as dij = 0 if i 6 = j. It follows that the ith row of DA is obtained by multiplying the ith row of A by dii. Similarly, post–multiplication of a matrix by a diagonal matrix D results in a matrix whose columns are those of A, multiplied by the respective diagonal elements of D. In particular,
diag (a 1 ,... , an)diag (b 1 ,... , bn) = diag (a 1 b 1 ,... , anbn),
as the left–hand side can be regarded as pre–multiplication of the matrix diag (b 1 ,... , bn) by the diagonal matrix diag (a 1 ,... , an). Finally, suppose that each of a 1 ,... , an is non–zero. Then a− 1 1 ,... , a− n^1 all exist and we have
diag (a 1 ,... , an)diag (a− 1 1 ,... , a− n 1 ) = diag (a 1 a− 1 1 ,... , ana− n 1 ) = diag (1,... , 1) = In.
Hence diag (a 1 ,... , an) is non–singular and its inverse is diag (a− 1 1 ,... , a− n 1 ).
Next suppose that ai = 0. Then diag (a 1 ,... , an) is row–equivalent to a matix containing a zero row and is hence singular.
Hence A is non–singular and A−^1 =
Also
E 23 (9)E 13 (−24)E 12 (−2)E 3 (1/2)E 23 E 31 (−3)E 12 A = I 3.
Hence
A−^1 = E 23 (9)E 13 (−24)E 12 (−2)E 3 (1/2)E 23 E 31 (−3)E 12 ,
so A = E 12 E 31 (3)E 23 E 3 (2)E 12 (2)E 13 (24)E 23 (−9).
1 2 k 3 − 1 1 5 3 − 5
1 2 k 0 − 7 1 − 3 k 0 − 7 − 5 − 5 k
1 2 k 0 − 7 1 − 3 k 0 0 − 6 − 2 k
Hence if − 6 − 2 k 6 = 0, i.e. if k 6 = −3, we see that B can be reduced to I 3 and hence A is non–singular.
If k = −3, then B =
(^) = B and consequently A is singu-
lar, as it is row–equivalent to a matrix containing a zero row.