Recent questions in Quantitative Techniques

No documents found, press Enter to search

I have written question in detail please someone explain hw thes question answer are 28/190 and83/190?

​ During safety and security drive of the Health Department, 190 private hospitals of a large city were surveyed. It was found that 79 hospitals were in violation of security standards, 86 were in violation of security standards and 58 were in violation of both. If a private hospital is chosen at random, find the probability that it is in compliance with Sanitary standards but not with security standards. A. 28/190 OR 0.147368 B. 25/190 OR 0.131579 C. 20/190 OR 0.105263 D. 30/190 OR 0.157895 ANSWER: A. During safety and security drive of the Health Department, 190 private hospitals of a large city were surveyed. It was found that 79 hospitals were in violation of security standards, 86 were in violation of security standards and 58 were in violation of both. If a private hospital is chosen at random, find the probability that it is in compliance with Both Sanitary and Security standards. A. 83/190 OR 0.436842 B. 85/190 OR 0.442708 C. 88/190 OR 0.458333 D. 84/190 OR 0.442105 ​ ​ ​
0

Quantitative Aptitute in SSC Exam

What is the strategy to master the quantitative aptitute for the https://www.eduncle.com/ssc-cgl-recruitment-exam as I am facing extreme problems on this section?
0

GC quantitative analysis

Hello, ​ I am analyzing a reaction mixture by GC and I am facing trouble quantifying the desired product. ​ the technical department has gone through the process of calibration curve so, I have a ratio between the standard and the product of interest (0,63). ​ After performing my reaction, I prepare a sample for GC analysis. To do that, I add in a vial a known amount (mg) of the reaction mixture, the standard and the solvent. Then I submit the sample for GC. ​ I received a spectrum where there are different peaks. As I know the retention time of the product and the standard, it is easy to identify them. I use the following formula to calculate the product of amount I am having from this reaction: Area(product)/Area (standard) * ratio * m (standard) ​ My question is calulating the mass following the above steps never give me the right amount of product I have (I have perform a purification of the reaction mixture to know how much I have and see if it was accurate). Is there any steps missing in my calculation? ​ Also, as I have prepared a sample for GC (dilution of the reaction mixture), how does it represent the reaction mixture? I never used the dilution I have made for the calculation of the mass of the product. If I have to, how should I do that? ​ ​
0

Elaborate on the motivation for this paper, highlighting the focus of inquiry (i.e. the broad question of interest)

Below is the title and abstract of an article which was published in the Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6, page 2265 – 2295. Critically reflect on the abstract and answer the questions that follow. Entrepreneurial Imaginativeness in New Venture Ideation Alexander S. Kier and Jeffery S. McMullen Abstract Although theories of entrepreneurial action regularly acknowledge the importance of imagination, the ability is rarely defined or measured, and thus effectively treated as uniform in degree and type. Using a creative problem-solving lens, we identify and measure three different cognitive skills—creative, social, and practical imaginativeness—that vary across individuals. Each skill combines the ability of imagination with the knowledge needed to mentally simulate various task-related scenarios used in generating and selecting ideas for new value creation. We then conduct a quasi-experiment to examine each skill’s relative effect on new venture ideation. We find that the three imaginativeness skills vary across individuals and that they predict new venture idea quantity and quality differently over and above the effects of motivation, knowledge, and experience. We conclude with implications for theory development in entrepreneurship and creative problem-solving. ​ 2.1 Elaborate on the motivation for this paper, highlighting the focus of inquiry (i.e. the broad question of interest). ​ 2.2 Comment on the strategic relevance of Kier and McMullen’s (2018) findings and highlight two key shortcomings of most quasi-experiments.
1

I have written question in detail please someone explain hw thes question answer are 28/190 and83/190?

​ During safety and security drive of the Health Department, 190 private hospitals of a large city were surveyed. It was found that 79 hospitals were in violation of security standards, 86 were in violation of security standards and 58 were in violation of both. If a private hospital is chosen at random, find the probability that it is in compliance with Sanitary standards but not with security standards. A. 28/190 OR 0.147368 B. 25/190 OR 0.131579 C. 20/190 OR 0.105263 D. 30/190 OR 0.157895 ANSWER: A. During safety and security drive of the Health Department, 190 private hospitals of a large city were surveyed. It was found that 79 hospitals were in violation of security standards, 86 were in violation of security standards and 58 were in violation of both. If a private hospital is chosen at random, find the probability that it is in compliance with Both Sanitary and Security standards. A. 83/190 OR 0.436842 B. 85/190 OR 0.442708 C. 88/190 OR 0.458333 D. 84/190 OR 0.442105 ​ ​ ​
0

linear programming under quantitative technique

enumerate assumptions implied in the application of linear programming model
1

Advantages and disadvantages of Quantitative research design

What is the advantages and disadvantages of the quantitative reserach approach?
3

Quantitative Aptitute in SSC Exam

What is the strategy to master the quantitative aptitute for the https://www.eduncle.com/ssc-cgl-recruitment-exam as I am facing extreme problems on this section?
0
1-6 of 8

Quantitative Aptitute in SSC Exam

What is the strategy to master the quantitative aptitute for the https://www.eduncle.com/ssc-cgl-recruitment-exam as I am facing extreme problems on this section?
0

Advantages and disadvantages of Quantitative research design

What is the advantages and disadvantages of the quantitative reserach approach?
3

linear programming under quantitative technique

enumerate assumptions implied in the application of linear programming model
1

GC quantitative analysis

Hello, ​ I am analyzing a reaction mixture by GC and I am facing trouble quantifying the desired product. ​ the technical department has gone through the process of calibration curve so, I have a ratio between the standard and the product of interest (0,63). ​ After performing my reaction, I prepare a sample for GC analysis. To do that, I add in a vial a known amount (mg) of the reaction mixture, the standard and the solvent. Then I submit the sample for GC. ​ I received a spectrum where there are different peaks. As I know the retention time of the product and the standard, it is easy to identify them. I use the following formula to calculate the product of amount I am having from this reaction: Area(product)/Area (standard) * ratio * m (standard) ​ My question is calulating the mass following the above steps never give me the right amount of product I have (I have perform a purification of the reaction mixture to know how much I have and see if it was accurate). Is there any steps missing in my calculation? ​ Also, as I have prepared a sample for GC (dilution of the reaction mixture), how does it represent the reaction mixture? I never used the dilution I have made for the calculation of the mass of the product. If I have to, how should I do that? ​ ​
0

Elaborate on the motivation for this paper, highlighting the focus of inquiry (i.e. the broad question of interest)

Below is the title and abstract of an article which was published in the Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6, page 2265 – 2295. Critically reflect on the abstract and answer the questions that follow. Entrepreneurial Imaginativeness in New Venture Ideation Alexander S. Kier and Jeffery S. McMullen Abstract Although theories of entrepreneurial action regularly acknowledge the importance of imagination, the ability is rarely defined or measured, and thus effectively treated as uniform in degree and type. Using a creative problem-solving lens, we identify and measure three different cognitive skills—creative, social, and practical imaginativeness—that vary across individuals. Each skill combines the ability of imagination with the knowledge needed to mentally simulate various task-related scenarios used in generating and selecting ideas for new value creation. We then conduct a quasi-experiment to examine each skill’s relative effect on new venture ideation. We find that the three imaginativeness skills vary across individuals and that they predict new venture idea quantity and quality differently over and above the effects of motivation, knowledge, and experience. We conclude with implications for theory development in entrepreneurship and creative problem-solving. ​ 2.1 Elaborate on the motivation for this paper, highlighting the focus of inquiry (i.e. the broad question of interest). ​ 2.2 Comment on the strategic relevance of Kier and McMullen’s (2018) findings and highlight two key shortcomings of most quasi-experiments.
1
1-6 of 8
Quantitative Techniques