"Why are McCabe’s cyclomatic number and Halstead’s software science not readily applicable to object-oriented software?"

What is the disadvantage of McCabe’s cyclomatic number and Halstead’s software science with respect to Object Oriented Software?

Add a comment


6 replies


"These two metrics are based on the size and complexity of an algorithm written as a single function. Object-oriented functions are usually spread over a number of meth-ods, often in different classes. Each object-oriented function is often small and rela-tively simple. Thus, these two metrics will probably not give a good measure of the complexity of the object-oriented system."

Add a comment


Two hundred can be a way of measuring this command structure intricacy associated with software program. Oahu is the variety of linearly self-sufficient trails and so, this bare minimum amount of impartial walkways as soon as performing the software program.

Add a comment